- UFC Odds for Gilbert Burns +425 betting underdog, Khamzat Chimaev -600 favorite.
- Khamzat Chimaev is 4-0 in the UFC and has only received one significant strike.
- The odds opened as a pick’em, now Khamzat is a firm favorite over Burns.
The Khamzat Chimaev train keeps on rolling. UFC’s biggest prospect is eyeing up the whole welterweight division and is looking to leapfrog up the ranks once again.
His next opponent is #2 ranked Gilbert Burns for UFC 273. With the whole welterweight division on notice, is Burns the man to finally test Chimaev? We review the UFC 273 odds for this exciting upcoming fight.
Gilbert Burns vs Khamzat Chimaev Odds
When the opening UFC 273 odds were released online sports betting sites had this as a 50/50 fight. Within hours, the betting line swayed in the favor of Khamzat Chimaev as a -600 betting favorite. That’s an implied win probability of 85.7% for “Borz”. For the betting underdog here, making money on Gilbert Burns here is a real possibility (Bet $100, win $425).
The featherweight title bout between Volkanovski and Jung is set to Headline UFC 273. With Alexander Volkanovski vs Korean Zombie Odds already live.
UFC 273 Online Sportsbooks
|Online Sportsbook||Sportsbook Review|
|BetMGM Sportsbook||BetMGM Ontario Review|
|BetRivers Sportsbook||BetRivers Ontario Review|
|Unibet Sportsbook||Unibet Ontario Review|
Betting on Burns vs Chimaev
Chimaev expressed an interest in returning to the Octagon as soon as possible, with December being a desired amount of time after his dominant victory at UFC 267 against Li Jingliang. Various names have been in the mix for his next opponent from Nate Diaz to Leon Edwards.
Whereas Burns is coming off a decision win over Stephen Thompson at UFC 264. He’s willing to give Chimaev the opportunity and a risk one at that.
The quick turnaround is a smart idea from the undefeated Chimaev. Who spend the majority of 2021 on the sidelines due to COVID. Prior to his return at UFC 267, Chimaev made quick work of his first three UFC opponents.
Betting on Chimaev to win by finish would be the smartest bet here. We’ve seen Gilbert Burns knocked down by Kamaru Usman’s jabs and with the sheer speed and power of Khamzat.
There still remains many unknowns about Khamzat, if the fight goes beyond the second round. Also, how will he face adversity – if Burns lands some heavy shots and goes for a submission? Both fighters are well equipped for the ground if this fight hits the mat. If you are looking for a juicy MMA betting bonus, check out our Sports Interaction review.
Where Khamzat has an advantage over the whole 170-pound division is his sheer pressure and ability to get his opponents out of the fight within the first round. It really could be another smash and grab for Khamzat when he takes on Burns.
Khamzat’s Incredible Numbers so Far
It only 66 days for Chimaev to reach 3-0 in the UFC. He’s surpassed Johnny Walker (105 days). Chimaev is also the fastest to score three wins at any point in a UFC career, bettering Bobby Green (84 days).
Chimaev’s total domination over four UFC fights include:
- Total strikes advantage of 254-2
- Significant strikes advantage of 112-1
- Four takedowns landed and none has given up
- Control time advantage of 11:56 to no control time for opponents
4 x $50k Bonus Performances
Chimaev pocketed a $50,000 bonus for the performance of the night after each of his four UFC bouts. No other fighter has done that through four UFC appearances.
If you are looking for some extra benefits from signing up with an online sportsbook for UFC betting, then check out our dedicated page on the best UFC betting sites. One US state is looking to legalize online sports betting is California.
Is Khamzat the real deal? Comment below on your early prediction for Khamzat vs Burns below.
UFC 273 Predictions
UFC 273 is set to go down Saturday, April 9 at VyStar Veterans Memorial Arena, Jacksonville United States. Headlined by Alexander Volkonvski vs The Korean Zombie and featuring a read grudge match for the bantamweight title, you can check out the latest Sterling vs Yan 2 Prediction here.